Want to get an insider’s view of the YouTube/Google deal? Check out Mark Cuban’s blog: Some intimate details on the Google YouTube Deal.

Includes such gems as:

The media companies had their typical challenges. Specifically, how to
get money from Youtube without being required to give any to the talent (musicians and actors)? If monies were received as part of a license to Youtube then they would contractually obligated to share a substantial portion of the proceeds with others. For example most record label contracts call for artists to get 50% of all license deals. It was decided the media companies would receive an equity position as an investor in Youtube which Google would buy from them. This shelters all the up front monies from any royalty demands by allowing them to classify it as gains from an investment position. A few savvy agents might complain about receiving nothing and get a token amount, but most will be unaware of what transpired.

Cuban doesn’t know if it’s true or not, but it sure appears to be.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


One Response to “Machiavellian isn’t the half of it”  

  1. 1 Emma

    sounds good to me

Comments are disabled as this is now an archive site. All new comments and new posts available on Sparkplug 9.

Comments are disabled as this is now an archive site. All new comments and new posts available on Sparkplug 9.


Subscribe without commenting.



Welcome to my old site. I'm John Koetsier, and you're in the wrong place.

I'd really, really like to welcome you to my new site at Sparkplug 9.

It has all the great stuff from this site, plus an updated look, and all my recent posts. Thanks!



subscribe

      Subscribe with Bloglines

Add to Technorati Favorites

Recent Comments


best of bizhack

Archives

trust

skype me

My status

text link ads

new-fangled blogroll